CrossRef Text and Data Mining
Result of CrossRef Text and Data Mining Search is the related articles with entitled article. If you click link1 or link2 you will be able to reach the full text site of selected articles; however, some links do not show the full text immediately at now. If you click CrossRef Text and Data Mining Download icon, you will be able to get whole list of articles from literature included in CrossRef Text and Data Mining.
Efficiency of Spinal Anesthesia versus General Anesthesia for Minimal Invasive Single Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Analysis of 178 Patients
Ameya Rangnekar, Goparaju VNR Praveen, Amit Chugh, Saijyot Raut, Vishal Kundnani
J Minim Invasive Spine Surg Tech. 2022;7(1):107-112.   Published online 2022 January 18
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21182/jmisst.2021.00241

Excel Download

Efficiency of Spinal Anesthesia versus General Anesthesia for Minimal Invasive Single Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Retrospective Analysis of 178 Patients
Journal of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery and Technique. 2022;7(1):107-112   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Comparative Study of Unilateral Minimal Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Mini-Open Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion for the Treatment of Single-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spine Diseases: Retrospective Matched Analysis of Clinical and Radiologic Results in Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up
The Spine Journal. 2014;14(11):S115-S116   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Comparison of an innovative endoscopic posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technique and a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion technique in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: a retrospective analysis
. 2022;   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Minimal invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics. 2016;50(5):464-472   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Efficiency of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for lumbar spinal surgery: a retrospective analysis of 544 patients
Local and Regional Anesthesia. 2017;Volume 10:91-98   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Peri-operative and 12-month outcomes in primary single level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus conventional lumbar fusion
The Spine Journal. 2017;17(3):S6   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Assessing the Environmental Carbon Footprint of Spinal versus General Anesthesia in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusions
World Neurosurgery. 2022;   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Clinical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Three-Level Degenerative Lumbar Spinal Stenosis
BioMed Research International. 2016;2016:1-7   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3

Commentary: Retrospective Review of Immediate Restoration of Lordosis in Single-Level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Comparison of Static and Expandable Interbody Cages
Operative Neurosurgery. 2020;18(5):E153-E154   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2

Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in the treatment of single-level lumbar spondylolisthesis
Egyptian Journal of Neurosurgery. 2019;34(1):   Crossref logo
Link1 Link2 Link3