Full-endoscopic Intradiscal Surgery: State of the Art

Article information

J Minim Invasive Spine Surg Tech. 2022;7(1):84-89
Publication date (electronic) : 2022 April 29
doi : https://doi.org/10.21182/jmisst.2022.00395
1Department of Orthopedics, Tokushima University Graduate School, Tokushima, Japan
Corresponding Author: Koichi Sairyo, MD, PhD Department of Orthopedics, Tokushima University Graduate School, 3-18-15 Kuramoto, Tokushima 770-8503, Japan Tel: +81-88-633-7240 Fax: +81-88-633-0178 E-mail: sairyokun@hotmail.com
Received 2022 January 14; Accepted 2022 April 23.

Abstract

Two types of full-endoscopic intradiscal surgery have been described in the literature. The first is full-endoscopic thermal annuloplasty, which was introduced in 2004 for discogenic pain. The proposed pain generator is a high signal intensity zone or a toxic annular tear, which can be treated by full-endoscopic thermal annuloplasty using a bipolar radio-pulse device. The second is full-endoscopic disc cleaning surgery, which is more recent and has been used to treat intractable chronic low back pain due to type 1 Modic change. In this review, we describe the current status of full-endoscopic intradiscal surgery.

INTRODUCTION

The basic surgical treatment for spinal disorders is decompression and fusion. By the late 20th century, spine surgery had become less invasive with the introduction of the microscope [1] and micro-endoscope [2]. Now, early in this new century, the establishment of full-endoscopic spine surgery (FESS) [3,4] and subsequent refinement of the technique has made it possible to perform minimally invasive discectomy [5,6], decompression for stenosis [7-9], and trans-Kambin lumbar interbody fusion surgery [10,11].

More recently, FESS has been proposed as a surgical strategy for pain management. Three types of FESS for pain management have been reported, namely, rhizotomy [12,13], radio-pulse thermal annuloplasty [14,15], and disc cleaning [16]. In this review article, we focus on the current status of intradiscal FESS, which includes thermal annuloplasty and disc cleaning.

THERMAL ANNULOPLASTY

1. Surgical Indications

Thermal annuloplasty is indicated for discogenic low back pain. Two features can help us to clinically understand discogenic pain: a high-intensity zone (HIZ) and a toxic annular tear (TAT).

The HIZ is an area of high signal intensity at the posterior annulus seen on sagittal and axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images (MRI) (Figure 1). It was first described in 1992 by Aprill and Bogduk [17], who found an 86% incidence of concordant painful discography in lumbar discs with an HIZ in patients with low back pain (LBP). They proposed a HIZ on MRI as a significant diagnostic sign of discogenic LBP. Figure 1 and 2 show representative cases of HIZ on MRI. Figure 1 shows the scans of a male professional baseball player who experienced severe LBP when playing. He was successfully treated by intradiscal injection for the pain. Figure 2 shows the scans of a female elite skier who was referred to us with severe LBP. Intradiscal injection relieved her pain and she was able to attend the subsequent Olympic games. Three years after the injection, although her disc degeneration had advanced, the HIZ was smaller and she had no LBP (Figure 2). There are several reports suggesting that an HIZ could be a marker of discogenic LBP [18-20]; however, its clinical significance remains controversial.

Figure 1.

Sagittal and axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images showing a high-intensity zone at the posterior annulus. The patient is a professional baseball player who experienced severe low back pain when playing. His pain was successfully treated by intradiscal injection.

Figure 2.

Magnetic resonance images showing a high-intensity zone before and after intradiscal injection in a female elite skier and Olympian. Intradiscal injection was effective in decreasing the pain, and she was able to attend the next Olympic Games. Three years after the injection, although her disc degeneration had advanced, the high-intensity zone was smaller.

The TAT, named by Yeung [21], refers to an annular tear that is symptomatic. It is characterized by pain-sensitive granulation tissue within the tear. Bernard [22] investigated 250 patients with chronic LBP using both computed tomography (CT) discography and MRI and concluded that CT discography is more sensitive, especially for a painful annular tear with a normal disc on MRI. Discography continues to be a useful functional test for understanding discogenic pain. Manchikanti et al. [23] reviewed the role of discography in the diagnosis of discogenic LBP and found it to be useful for identifying a subset of patients with chronic LBP secondary to an intervertebral disc disorder.

2. Surgical Technique

Radio-pulse thermal annuloplasty is a surgical technique that was first performed by Tsou et al. [15]. It involves utilization of full-endoscopic discectomy [3-5]. A cannula is installed into the disc space under local anesthesia via the transforaminal approach. An outside-in foraminoplasty technique is used when the intervertebral foramen is narrow or there are concerns about exiting nerve root injury [24]. First, the area of the TAT is ablated using the bipolar radio-pulse device. The cannula is then advanced towards the posterior annulus to determine if there is an HIZ. Figure 3A shows the endoscopic view of a TAT. In Figure 3B, a vascularized disc fragment can be seen in the area showing an HIZ. After ablation of the TAT and HIZ, the radio-pulse thermal annuloplasty is completed.

Figure 3.

Endoscopic views showing a TAT (A) and HIZ (B). The TAT is seen as a clear fissure at the posterior annulus fibrosus. A vascularized disc fragment is obvious in the area containing the HIZ. HIZ: high-intensity zone, TAT: toxic annular tear.

3. Clinical Results

In the initial report by Tsou et al. [15], the outcome was excellent in 17 of 113 patients (15%) and good in 32 (28.3%). Therefore, only 43.3% of patients in their series has favorable results. On the other hand, Pan et al. [25] reviewed 62 consecutive patients who underwent thermal annuloplasty and reported an overall success rate of 75.8%. Ahn and Lee [26] reported a similar success rate of 70% and better clinical results in patients who also had central disc protrusion. Manabe et al. [14] reviewed 12 elite athletes who underwent radio-pulse thermal annuloplasty. Nine (75.0%) were found to have an HIZ at the level of the affected disc. The LBP disappeared soon after the surgery in 10 patients (83.3%), all of whom could returned to play within 3 months of surgery.

4. Representative Case

Figure 4 shows the preoperative MRI and CT discography findings in another male baseball player with a clinical diagnosis of chronic discogenic pain. MRI indicates disc degeneration at L4/5 and L5/S1. Slight HIZ is seen at L4/5 and a clear annular tear is evident at the same level. The patient’s LBP disappeared immediately after surgery. He has been very active in the ensuing season and has achieved his best performance to date.

Figure 4.

Findings on MRI and CT discography before thermal annuloplasty in a male baseball player with a clinical diagnosis of chronic discogenic pain. MRI shows disc degeneration at L4/5 and L5/S1. A slight high-intensity zone can be seen at L4/5 and a toxic annular tear is evident in the same level (arrows).

DISC CLEANING

1. Surgical Indication

Disc cleaning is a recently reported technique and there is as yet no consensus about it in the literature. Based on the initial report by Sairyo et al. [16], disc cleaning is indicated for intractable chronic LBP due to type 1 Modic change. Of the three types of Modic change—type 1 (inflammation), type 2 (fatty marrow), and type 3 (bone sclerosis)—only type 1 is painful [27]. Intradiscal injection would be the non-surgical treatment for painful Modic type 1 change [28,29]. Figure 5 shows MRI scans obtained before and after intradiscal therapy in a former world martial arts champion. His LBP disappeared after a couple of intradiscal injections and MRI scans revealed conversion from type 1 to type 3 Modic change.

Figure 5.

Short tau inversion recovery magnetic resonance images obtained before and after treatment for Modic change in a male martial arts fighter, who was a former world champion. Type 1 inflammation was clearly present before treatment but subsided following a couple of intradiscal injections. After intradiscal treatment, the Modic type was downgraded to type 3 sclerotic change.

Although fusion would be the gold standard surgical treatment for painful Modic change [30], full-endoscopic disc cleaning may be a new alternative for type 1 change.

2. Surgical Technique and Clinical Results

Full-endoscopic disc cleaning is another application of full-endoscopic discectomy [3-5]. Using either an outside-in or an inside-out technique, a cannula is inserted into the disc space, which normally contains cartilaginous tissue. However, a disc space with type 1 Modic change may contain fibrotic scar tissue instead [31]. This fibrous tissue should be removed and then be followed by copious irrigation and washing given that type 1 Modic change is thought to be caused by low-grade infection [32-36]. There have been two case reports in which disc cleaning was effective for alleviating LBP [16,31]. Kishima [37] reviewed his initial 10 cases of disc cleaning surgery for type 1 Modic change and found that the procedure was effective in 8 of them. Thus, it is necessary to clarify what kind of type 1 Modic change would be a good indication for disc cleaning.

3. Representative Case

Figure 6 shows short tau inversion recovery MRI scans obtained before and after disc cleaning surgery in a 37-year-old man with a history of severe LBP for more than a year. The preoperative image clearly suggests type 1 inflammation surrounding the L4 and L5 endplates. The image obtained 2 months after surgery shows a decrease in the high signal change, indicating that the inflammation has subsided. Clinically, the patient’s visual analog scale score for LBP when performing normal activities decreased from 8/10 to 1/10.

Figure 6.

Short tau inversion recovery magnetic resonance images showing the effect of full-endoscopic disc cleaning surgery in a 37-year-old man. The image obtained before surgery clearly suggests type 1 change and another taken 2 months after surgery shows a decrease in the high signal change, indicating that the inflammation has subsided.

CONCLUSION

In this paper, we have reviewed two types of full-endoscopic intradiscal surgery. The gold standard worldwide for discogenic pain and type 1 Modic change is fusion surgery. However, full-endoscopic surgery could avoid the need for fusion and may surpass the present gold standard treatment. The clinical outcome is generally acceptable, although the exact indications for such surgery have yet to be confirmed.

Notes

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article.

References

1. McCulloch JA. Focus issue on lumbar disc herniation: macro- and microdiscectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:45S–56S.
2. Foley KT, Smith MM, Rampersaud YR. Microendoscopic approach to far-lateral lumbar disc herniation. Neurosurg Focus 1999;7:e5.
3. Yeung AT. The evolution of percutaneous spinal endoscopy and discectomy: state of the art. Mt Sinai J Med 2000;67:327–332.
4. Yeung AT, Tsou PM. Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:722–731.
5. Sairyo K, Egawa H, Matsuura T, Takahashi M, Higashino K, Sakai T, et al. State of the art: transforaminal approach for percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy under local anesthesia. J Med Invest 2014;61:217–225.
6. Choi G, Lee SH, Lokhande P, Kong BJ, Shim CS, Jung B, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic approach for highly migrated intracanal disc herniations by foraminoplastic technique using rigid working channel endoscope. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:E508–E515.
7. Kim HS, Singh R, Adsul NM, Oh SW, Noh JH, Jang IT. Management of root-level double crush: case report with technical notes on contralateral interlaminar foraminotomy with full endoscopic uniportal approach. World Neurosurg 2019;122:505–507.
8. Sairyo K, Higashino K, Yamashita K, Hayashi F, Wada K, Sakai T, et al. A new concept of transforaminal ventral facetectomy including simultaneous decompression of foraminal and lateral recess stenosis: technical considerations in a fresh cadaver model and a literature review. J Med Invest 2017;64:1–6.
9. Sairyo K, Yamashita K, Manabe H, Ishihama Y, Sugiura K, Tezuka F, et al. A novel surgical concept of transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar undercutting laminectomy (TE-LUL) for central canal stenosis of the lumbar spine with local anesthesia : a case report and literature review. J Med Invest 2019;66:224–229.
10. Ishihama Y, Morimoto M, Tezuka F, Yamashita K, Manabe H, Sugiura K, et al. Full-endoscopic trans-kambin triangle lumbar interbody fusion: surgical technique and nomenclature. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2021;doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1730970.
11. Nagahama K, Ito M, Abe Y, Murota E, Hiratsuka S, Takahata M. Early clinical results of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a new modified technique for treating degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Spine Surg Relat Res 2018;3:327–334.
12. Yeung A, Gore S. Endoscopically guided foraminal and dorsal rhizotomy for chronic axial back pain based on cadaver and endoscopically visualized anatomic study. Int J Spine Surg 2014;8:23.
13. Lee JH, Chen KT, Chang KS, Chen CM. How I do it? Fully endoscopic rhizotomy assisted with three-dimensional robotic C-arm navigation for sacroiliac joint pain. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2021;163:3297–3301.
14. Manabe H, Yamashita K, Tezuka F, Takata Y, Sakai T, Maeda T, et al. Thermal annuloplasty using percutaneous endoscopic discectomy for elite athletes with discogenic low back pain. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo) 2019;59:48–53.
15. Tsou PM, Alan Yeung C, Yeung AT. Posterolateral transforaminal selective endoscopic discectomy and thermal annuloplasty for chronic lumbar discogenic pain: a minimal access visualized intradiscal surgical procedure. Spine J 2004;4:564–573.
16. Sairyo K, Maeda T, Yamashita K, Tezuka F, Morimoto M, Yagi K, et al. A new surgical strategy for the intractable chronic low back pain due to type 1 Modic change using transforaminal full-endoscopic disc cleaning (FEDC) surgery under the local anesthesia: a case report and literature review. J Med Invest 2021;68:1–5.
17. Aprill C, Bogduk N. High-intensity zone: a diagnostic sign of painful lumbar disc on magnetic resonance imaging. Br J Radiol 1992;65:361–369.
18. Schellhas KP, Pollei SR, Gundry CR, Heithoff KB. Lumbar disc high-intensity zone. Correlation of magnetic resonance imaging and discography. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1996;21:79–86.
19. Peng B, Hou S, Wu W, Zhang C, Yang Y. The pathogenesis and clinical significance of a high-intensity zone (HIZ) of lumbar intervertebral disc on MR imaging in the patient with discogenic low back pain. Eur Spine J 2006;15:583–587.
20. Lam KS, Carlin D, Mulholland RC. Lumbar disc high-intensity zone: the value and significance of provocative discography in the determination of the discogenic pain source. Eur Spine J 2000;9:36–41.
21. Yeung AT. In-vivo endoscopic visualization of pain generators in the lumbar spine. J Spine 2017;6:385.
22. Bernard TN Jr. Lumbar discography followed by computed tomography. Refining the diagnosis of low-back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 1990;15:690–707.
23. Manchikanti L, Glaser SE, Wolfer L, Derby R, Cohen SP. Systematic review of lumbar discography as a diagnostic test for chronic low back pain. Pain Physician 2009;12:541–559.
24. Yoshinari H, Tezuka F, Yamashita K, Manabe H, Hayashi F, Ishihama Y, et al. Transforaminal full-endoscopic lumbar discectomy under local anesthesia in awake and aware conditions: the inside-out and outside-in techniques. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med 2019;12:311–317.
25. Pan F, Shen B, Chy SK, Yong Z, Liu X, Ba Z, et al. Transforaminal endoscopic system technique for discogenic low back pain: a prospective Cohort study. Int J Surg 2016;35:134–138.
26. Ahn Y, Lee SH. Outcome predictors of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and thermal annuloplasty for discogenic low back pain. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010;152:1695–1702.
27. Modic MT, Masaryk TJ, Ross JS, Carter JR. Imaging of degenerative disk disease. Radiology 1988;168:177–186.
28. Mefford J, Sairyo K, Sakai T, Hopkins J, Inoue M, Amari R, et al. Modic type I changes of the lumbar spine in golfers. Skeletal Radiol 2011;40:467–473.
29. Mineta K, Higashino K, Sakai T, Fukui Y, Sairyo K. Recurrence of type I Modic inflammatory changes in the lumbar spine: effectiveness of intradiscal therapy. Skeletal Radiol 2014;43:1645–1649.
30. Ohtori S, Yamashita M, Yamauchi K, Inoue G, Koshi T, Suzuki M, et al. Change in Modic type 1 and 2 signals after posterolateral fusion surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2010;35:1231–1235.
31. Nakajima D, Yamashita K, Takeuchi M, Sugiura K, Morimoto M, Tezuka F, et al. Full-endoscopic spine surgery for discogenic low back pain with high-intensity zones and Modic type 1 change in a professional baseball player. NMC Case Rep J 2021;8:587–593.
32. Albert HB, Kjaer P, Jensen TS, Sorensen JS, Bendix T, Manniche C. Modic changes, possible causes and relation to low back pain. Med Hypotheses 2008;70:361–368.
33. Albert HB, Lambert P, Rollason J, Sorensen JS, Worthington T, Pedersen MB, et al. Does nuclear tissue infected with bacteria following disc herniations lead to Modic changes in the adjacent vertebrae. Eur Spine J 2013;22:690–696.
34. Albert HB, Manniche C, Sorensen JS, Deleuran BW. Antibiotic treatment in patients with low-back pain associated with Modic changes type 1 (bone oedema): a pilot study. Br J Sports Med 2008;42:969–973.
35. Albert HB, Sorensen JS, Christensen BS, Manniche C. Antibiotic treatment in patients with chronic low back pain and vertebral bone edema (Modic type 1 changes): a double-blind randomized clinical controlled trial of efficacy. Eur Spine J 2013;22:697–707.
36. Manniche C, O’Neill S. New insights link low-virulent disc infections to the etiology of severe disc degeneration and Modic changes. Future Sci OA 2019;5:FSO389.
37. Kishima K. A new intradiscal therapy for painful Modic change: full-endoscopic disc cleaning (FEDC) surgery. Paper presented at: The 7th World Congress of Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery (WCMISST) and Techniques and The 29th International Intradiscal Therapy Society (ITTS); 2021 Nov 24-25; Tokyo, Japan. S1-6.

Article information Continued

Figure 1.

Sagittal and axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance images showing a high-intensity zone at the posterior annulus. The patient is a professional baseball player who experienced severe low back pain when playing. His pain was successfully treated by intradiscal injection.

Figure 2.

Magnetic resonance images showing a high-intensity zone before and after intradiscal injection in a female elite skier and Olympian. Intradiscal injection was effective in decreasing the pain, and she was able to attend the next Olympic Games. Three years after the injection, although her disc degeneration had advanced, the high-intensity zone was smaller.

Figure 3.

Endoscopic views showing a TAT (A) and HIZ (B). The TAT is seen as a clear fissure at the posterior annulus fibrosus. A vascularized disc fragment is obvious in the area containing the HIZ. HIZ: high-intensity zone, TAT: toxic annular tear.

Figure 4.

Findings on MRI and CT discography before thermal annuloplasty in a male baseball player with a clinical diagnosis of chronic discogenic pain. MRI shows disc degeneration at L4/5 and L5/S1. A slight high-intensity zone can be seen at L4/5 and a toxic annular tear is evident in the same level (arrows).

Figure 5.

Short tau inversion recovery magnetic resonance images obtained before and after treatment for Modic change in a male martial arts fighter, who was a former world champion. Type 1 inflammation was clearly present before treatment but subsided following a couple of intradiscal injections. After intradiscal treatment, the Modic type was downgraded to type 3 sclerotic change.

Figure 6.

Short tau inversion recovery magnetic resonance images showing the effect of full-endoscopic disc cleaning surgery in a 37-year-old man. The image obtained before surgery clearly suggests type 1 change and another taken 2 months after surgery shows a decrease in the high signal change, indicating that the inflammation has subsided.