AbstractMinimally invasive surgery is being increasingly used in numerous surgical procedures, and the management of intraspinal lesions is no exception. For spinal lesions, extensive muscle splitting and bony destruction induce fibrotic pain and spinal instability, increasing the possibility of unnecessary spinal fusion and fixation. The unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery technique (UBESST) is increasingly popular in minimally invasive spine surgery because it has wider indications for spine diseases and a freer view independent of surgical instruments. Herein, we introduce an alternative option where UBESST is used to manage extramedullary spinal lesions and avoid complications.
INTRODUCTIONMinimal invasive surgery is the future trend because patients can benefit from less hospital stay, less postoperative pain, minimal blood loss, and shorter recovery period. Surgical robotics, image guidance, and resolution upgrades have improved surgery, making it easier for surgeons to perform minimally invasive procedures.
At the beginning of the 21st century, several authors introduced various spinal decompression techniques to preserve the posterior midline structures, including endoscopic spine surgery [1-3]. In the beginning, the indication of spine endoscope is useful only for disc herniation. With the development of the endoscope and specialized surgical instruments, endoscope can be used for a variety of conditions including degeneration with spinal stenosis or foraminal stenosis, hypertrophied ligamentum flavum (LF), calcified protruded disc etc. In recent years, endoscopic cage implantation and interbody fusion [4-10] and tumor excision [11-14] were also reported. Unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery technique (UBESST) is the same as unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) technique in spine surgery, which is more and more popular in the minimal invasive spine surgery because it has wider indication for spine diseases and is more time-saving compared to single portal endoscopic spine surgery [15,16]. The first Taiwan UBESST meeting held on 2019, many new UBE technologies and applications were proposed. Nowadays, more and more spine surgeons in Taiwan are learning UBESST to treat their patients.
We introduce a method with interlaminar approach and UBESST to excise the intraspinal lesions.
INDICATIONParihar et al. [17] had successfully removed 18 tumors under microscopic or endoscopic visualization and retraction system if maximal sagittal and axial diameters did not exceed 4.1 cm and 1.8 cm, respectively. In our series, our largest resected tumor size is approximately 4.1 cm × 1.3 cm, so there may be a challenge if the tumor size greater than 4.1 cm in sagittal and 1.5 cm in axial diameter. In general, spinal tumors with fewer than 3 segments in the cervical spine and less than 2 segments in the thoracic and lumbar spine are recommended indications for intradural extramedullary (IDEM) tumor.
OUR CASE SERIESThis is a retrospective analysis of 31 consecutive adult (16 men and 15 women), aged 21–89 years with a verified diagnosis of spinal extradural and IDEM tumors who had been operated at the Orthopedic section of Taoyuan Armed Forces General Hospital by the same surgeon during the period from July 2017 to July 2023 (Table 1). All patients have received written informed consent for publication. The diagnosis was confirmed by image studies and postoperative excisional biopsy. The pathological examination of surgical specimens revealed 1 case of schwannoma, 1 case of meningioma, 2 cases of lipomatosis, 7 cases of cystic lesions (including perineural, epineural, facet joint cysts), 4 cases of tophaceous lesions, and 16 cases of calcium pyrophosphate dihydrate deposition, as known as pseudogout. Although we only had 2 cases of intradural tumors, there were still 3 cases of epidural tumors that invaded the dura. In these cases, we performed dural repair under endoscope, which is quite different from other epidural lesions.
Postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of IDEM lesions showed a sufficiently decompressed spinal canal and foramen after the complete removal of the extradural mass, no intradural tumor recurrence was found either (Figure 1). Complications included orthostatic headache that resolved within 1 week in 2 patients and transient generalized convulsions in the postoperative anesthesia room in 1 patient. The patient with epileptic seizures had a history of uncontrolled blood pressure and a habit of drinking a lot (one bottle of wine per day). There were no obvious abnormalities in the postoperative brain computed tomography (CT), so it could not be excluded that increased intracranial pressure (IICP) induced epileptic seizures.
SURGICAL TECHNIQUEAll patient selected were treated by the UBESST, as described below.
1. Patient PositioningThe patient is placed in the prone position on the radiolucent table with spine, hip and knee flexion under general anesthesia. The patient’s blood pressure was controlled to 90–110 mmHg/50–70 mmHg (mean arterial pressure≥70 mmHg) with anesthetic drugs to reduce intraoperative bleeding. It is important to reduce lumbar lordosis and increase foraminal space by flexing the hip and knee joints to reduce abdominal pressure and prevent epidural hemorrhage. For upper cervical spine tumors, the head should be fixed with head rest and adapters, the neck should be flexed and the upper back tilted downward to increase venous return and reduce intraoperative bleeding. For lower cervical or upper thoracic spinal tumors, the head should be immobilized with a head restraint and the shoulders should be pulled down with cloth tape.
2.Preoperative PlanningThe surgeon stood on the right side of the patient. A marked line was drawn along the middle line of the pedicle of the vertebrae. Another marked line was drawn along the spinous processes, interlaminar foramen could be marked with a circle zone and a parallel line was drawn along the intervertebral disc (Figure 2). Two points, 1.5 cm (1.0 cm for cervical) above and below the disc lower level at the inner edge of the pedicular line, were used as the body surface positioning points of the view portal and work portal, respectively. If the patient is obese or requires the use of pedicle screws, the 2 incisions should be wider and placed laterally from the midline (lateral line of the pedicle).
3.After Sterilizing and Covering DrapesUnder the guidance of C-arm fluoroscopy, 2 longitudinal skin incisions were made to form the view (caudal side) and work (cranial side) portals. The length of the skin incision was about 0.5–0.7 cm for view portal and 1.0 cm or larger for work portal so that the endoscope and instrument can be inserted properly, the saline flow can be maintained smoothly and the complete tumor mass can be removed easier. For cervical lesions, a deeper incision through layers of fascia is necessary and feel the feedback of resistance to avoid piercing the interlaminar space. The trocar with sleeve was inserted into the caudal incision (view portal) toward the interlaminar foramen and through the subcutaneous tissue, and fascia layer. The guide rod (or obturator) was inserted into the cranial incision (work portal) through the subcutaneous tissue, and fascia layer, too. Fluoroscopy determined that the 2 positioning of sleeve and rod, crossed at the above of LF of interlaminar foramen. Serial dilators were used to separate the back muscle and enlarge the work portal. A 30° endoscope, with 2.7 mm in diameter for cervical spine and with 4 mm for thoracic and lumbar spine, was inserted through the view portal. The irrigation system was connected to the sleeve and turned on for continuous irrigation. A natural gravity irrigation system (about 70–100 cm above the table) or pumping system (with pressure 30-40 mmHg) was used for continuous saline irrigation. The plasma radiofrequency (RF) wand was inserted through the work portal to create a small space enough to avoid obscuring the view of endoscope on the interlaminar surface and control bleeding so as to ensure the clarity of the surgical field. A blurred surgical field can cause neural structure injury, so it is important to maintain a clear view of the surgical field.
4. Unilateral Laminectomy for Bilateral DecompressionThe LF was found if the direction is correct and partial laminectomy was performed at cranial side for better removal of the LF. Bilateral flavectomy was performed using curved curette, pituitary forceps and Kerrison punches. The surgical field was expanded to the periphery by adjusting the direction of the endoscope and fully expose the target point (tumor location) near the interlaminar space. After bilateral interlaminar decompression was performed, the thecal sac and extradural mass under the pedicle would be identified. Avoid to destruct the facet joint and partial resection of the base of the spinous process (over-the-top decompression) is allowed to increase the working space and better vision for the dura and intraspinal lesion. Epidural bleeding can be effectively managed by the low-voltage RF bipolar system under clear vision and by the continuous saline irrigation adding with epinephrine (0.1-mg epinephrine /1,000-mL normal saline). The extradural masses were meticulously dissected with a nerve dissector and removed with curved curette and pituitary forceps.
5. For IDEM LesionsIntraoperative fluoroscopy determines the upper and lower boundaries of the tumor according to preoperative imaging data (CT or MRI). The dural sac and target tumor should be exposed after expending the surgical field. For IDEM lesions, a sharp scalpel was used to make a longitudinal incision of the tense dura, which was propped up by the tumor, with an extended incision according to the size of tumor. The incision also could be extended by a forceps (Figure 3). The water pumping system is closed or opened intermittently to prevent spinal hypertension or hydrocephalus. A duragen with appropriate size is used to block the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow and placed on the cranial tumor pole. The adhesions were dissected with a nerve dissector and the tumor was removed with a forceps. The small vessels on epidural region and around the tumor could be coagulated by a smaller models of plasma RF wand for hemostasis. The dural origin is coagulated to reduce the recurrence rate. The incised dura was sutured with a 6–0-diameter prolene under endoscope (Figure 4) and covered with fibrin sealant and duragen to prevent the formation of liquor cysts. No drainage tube was needed if no obvious bleeding and outflow of CSF were found.
COMPLICATION AVOIDANCEIt has the advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, faster recovery, less damage to posterior soft tissue and bone structure, and no need for additional internal fixation. However, it still has some disadvantages including the inability to treat tumors that are too large (more than 3 spinal segments in cervical spine or 2 spinal segments in thoracic and lumbar spine), the potential for CSF leakage, postoperative hematoma and spinal hypertension syndrome. The management of complications is described as follows.
1. CSF LeakageIt is common for surgeons who are new to UBE to experience damage to the dura mater. A dura tear is the most common complication (1.9%–8.6%) in UBE and occurs most frequently in the thecal sac, axillar, tranversing root [18]. Wang et al. [19] reported that the incidence of intraoperative or postoperative CSF leakage is 2.49% due to tearing of the dura mater during UBE surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis. Causes of dural tears include adhesion of tumors or fibrotic scars, poor hemostasis or massive bleeding leading to blind procedure, instrument stab wounds, central fold tears, etc. For adhesion cases, meticulous use of a nerve dissector or angled curette is better than use of forceps or punches. For hemostasis, if the source of bleeding cannot be found, the endoscope can be advanced as close as possible to the suspected bleeding focus. This is accomplished by temporarily increasing hydrostatic pressure to flush out the blood, then using a small RF probe to coagulate the bleeding. A dura tear can occur when additional bone work is performed close to the exposed dura after the LF has been removed. The meningovertebral ligament is responsible for pulling the dura back, so this is not confirmed and there is a high possibility of making a dura tear during the removal of various epidural tissue [16]. In endoscopic spine surgery, hydrostatic pressure causes central folding of dura, and beginners have a high risk of tearing the dura because the working space is frequently restricted in inexperienced surgery [20]. When a dura tear occurs, water pressure should be decreased to prevent IICP and simple observation with absolute bed rest is recommended for injuries less than 4 mm [18,21]. For 5- to 10-mm tear, we trim the duragen into an elongated shape and inject half of it into the intradural space, like repairing a tire. Finally, cover another piece of duragen about 10 mm × 10 mm on it. Bone edges can be used to secure duragen patches (Figure 5).
For large dura tears of more than 10 mm, endoscopic repair will be performed. The pledgeted suture method can be used to reduce the suture numbers and avoid leakage of CSF (Figure 6). Postoperative management can be summarized as wound drainage was removed followed by wound sutures, prophylactic antibiotics, dexamethasone, elevated head position, and continuous lumbar subarachnoid drainage treatment [22].
2. Postoperative HematomaThe most common cause of postoperative hematoma is inadequate hemostasis, which leads to an unsatisfactory clinical outcome after surgery [16]. Postoperative hematoma may occur as epidural fibrosis, which can interfere with the expansion of the dural sac [23]. Hydrostatic pressure masking bleeding, tumor bleeding, bone bleeding, epidural vascular bleeding, muscle bleeding and patient factors should be considered when performing UBESST excision. Hydrostatic pressure of UBE and low blood pressure of patient may mask the bleeding and lead to postoperative bleeding and hematoma formation. Before wound closure, it is important to turn off the saline pumping system and check for bleeding regularly. Low-voltage RF is used to control bleeding in patients with highly vascular tumors, osteoporotic bone, or highly abundant epidural vessels. Bone wax can also be applied to the bleeding bone surface by using a burr tip. If the bleeding is from the endoscopic portal rather than within the surgical field, there may be bleeding from the muscle arteries, which should be confirmed and electrocoagulation performed. For patients with low platelet counts, a count of 50,000/μL is considered acceptable for nonneurological surgery, but higher platelet goals (closer to 100,000/μL) are recommended in patients with neurosurgical needs [24].
For patients receiving anticoagulants therapy, the last dose must be taken ≥48 hours before the procedure. When the patient’s estimated glomerular filtration rate is as low as 30–50 mL/min, it must be ≥72 hours. For patients receiving antiplatelet or antithrombotic therapy, it is recommended to stop taking the drug for 5 days. For patients with a high risk of thrombosis, low molecular weight heparin can be used instead. If antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy is discontinued, therapy should be resumed within 48 hours of surgery based on the perceived risk of bleeding and thrombosis [25].
3. Spinal HypertensionSpinal hypertension is a unique complication of endoscopic spinal surgery requiring water irrigation. It is often caused by intraoperative dural tear and high irrigation pressure [14]. When repairing the dura under endoscope, the water pumping should be closed or opened intermittently. If bleeding is not obvious, dry scope could be taken into consideration. Spinal hypertension should not be ignored as it is associated with serious neurologic complications such as headache, clumsiness, irritability, visual impairment, dizziness, tinnitus, seizures, near-death sensation, and dystonia. Treatment for the syndrome includes continued tracheal intubation, sedative medications, appropriate application of antihypertensive medications to control blood pressure, and necessary dehydrating medications and hormones. And symptoms and signs are generally completely relieved within 24 hours after surgery [14,26]. For intradural tumor excision surgeries, it should not take more than 60 minutes from endoscopic durotomy to endoscopic dural repair. When patient has a transient acute increase in blood pressure and bradycardia during surgery, stop water infusion and brain sponge compression for observation is recommended. When the durotomy to dural repair cannot be completed within 60 minutes or the patient's heart rate and blood pressure cannot be controlled, termination of the operation or conversion to open surgery should be considered, and a drainage tube should be placed before the wound is closed. Even if there is no dura tear, prolonged water pressure can cause postoperative back pain, neck pain, and sciatica.
DISCUSSIONThe intraspinal lesions we have treated in the past have been associated with extensive muscle splitting and bone destruction, resulting in spinal fibrotic pain and instability, increasing the likelihood of unnecessary spinal fusion and immobilization, and even increasing the risk of dural tear, postoperative infection and implant failure. We introduce a new method with transforaminal approach and UBE technique to excise the intraspinal lesions. This is a huge advance because only 2 tiny incisions are needed to treat a variety of intraspinal lesions and even dural repair. In fact, the postoperative results are also very excellent and patients can return to their daily activities quickly. As far as results are concerned, endoscopic excision of extradural and IDEM spinal lesions by UBESST is a good alternative method compared with other series of minimally invasive techniques [27].
CONCLUSIONAn endoscope can provide magnified views from different angles, different from the microscope. It is not only alleviating the need for hardware placement, but also potentially reducing complications from implant and soft tissue injury. The UBESST maximizes patient benefit and reduces surgical complications. However, endoscopic excision of IDEM is not recommended for beginners who have no experience with endoscopic treatment of dural tears.
NOTESFigure 1.Preoperative and postoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) comparison in intradural extramedullary lesions. Preoperative MRI (a–c) and postoperative MRI (A–C). (a, A) Meningioma of C7–T2. (b, B) Degenerative cyst of C1–2. (c, C) Schwannoma of L3–4. ![]() Figure 2.(A) X-ray landmark. The pedicular line and lower disc level line under C-arm intensified. If the patient is obese, rotated vertebrae or requires the use of pedicle screws, the 2 incisions should be wider and placed laterally from the midline (middle or lateral line of the pedicle). (B) Skin incision and triangulation. Two incisions, 1.5 cm (1.0 cm for cervical) above and below the disc lower level at the inner edge of the pedicular line, were inserted toward the target point (interlaminar foramen). ![]() Figure 3.Incision to intradural extramedullary tumor. (A) A sharp scalpel was used to make a longitudinal incision of the tense dura. (B) The incision was extended by forceps. ![]() Figure 4.Dura repair under endoscope. (A) The incised dura was sutured with a 6–0-diameter prolene. (B) The suture was tightened by a knot pusher. (C) The suture was cut after tying. ![]() Figure 5.Tire method for dura repair. (A) The trimmed duragen was loaded in the iron pipe. (B) Half of trimmed duragen was injected into the intradural space. (C) Covered another piece of duragen on it, the bone edge was used to secure duragen patche. ![]() Figure 6.The pledgeted suture method for dura repair. (A) The first duragen patch was push into the surface of dura after suture pass had done. (B) The second duragen patch was push into the dural surface. (C) The knot was tightened on the surface of duragen patches. (D) No dural beating was found after turning off pumping system, the leak should be considered as minimal and the repair was successful. ![]() Table 1.General data of patients REFERENCES1. Celik SE, Celik S, Göksu K, Kara A, Ince I. Microdecompressive laminatomy with a 5-year follow-up period for severe lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 2010;23:229–35.
![]() ![]() 2. Thomé C, Zevgaridis D, Leheta O, Bäzner H, Pöckler-Schöniger C, Wöhrle J, et al. Outcome after less-invasive decompression of lumbar spinal stenosis: a randomized comparison of unilateral laminotomy, bilateral laminotomy, and laminectomy. J Neurosurg Spine 2005;3:129–41.
![]() ![]() 3. Mikami Y, Nagae M, Ikeda T, Tonomura H, Fujiwara H, Kubo T. Tubular surgery with the assistance of endoscopic surgery via midline approach for lumbar spinal canal stenosis: a technical note. Eur Spine J 2013;22:2105–12.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 4. Wagner R, Haefner M. Uniportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion. Neurospine 2020;17(Suppl 1):S120–8.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 5. Wu J, Liu H, Ao S, Zheng W, Li C, Li H, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: technical note and preliminary clinical experience with 2-year follow-up. Biomed Res Int 2018;2018:5806037.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 6. Wu PH, Kim HS, Jang IT. A narrative review of development of full-endoscopic lumbar spine surgery. Neurospine 2020;17(Suppl 1):S20–33.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 7. Wu PH, Kim HS, Lee YJ, Kim DH, Lee JH, Jeon JB, et al. Uniportal full endoscopic posterolateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with endoscopic disc drilling preparation technique for symptomatic foraminal stenosis secondary to severe collapsed disc space: a clinical and computer tomographic study with technical note. Brain Sci 2020;10:373.
![]() ![]() ![]() 8. Wu W, Yang S, Diao W, Wang D, Guo Y, Yan M, et al. Analysis of clinical efficacy of endo-LIF in the treatment of single-segment lumbar degenerative diseases. J Clin Neurosci 2020;71:51–7.
![]() ![]() 9. Yang J, Liu C, Hai Y, Yin P, Zhou L, Zhang Y, et al. Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis: preliminary report of seven cases with 12-month follow-up. Biomed Res Int 2019;2019:3091459.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 10. Youn MS, Shin JK, Goh TS, Lee JS. Full endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion (FELIF): technical note. Eur Spine J 2018;27:1949–55.
![]() ![]() ![]() 11. Kim SK, Bendardaf R, Ali M, Kim HA, Heo EJ, Lee SC. Unilateral biportal endoscopic tumor removal and percutaneous stabilization for extradural tumors: technical case report and literature review. Front Surg 2022;9:863931.
![]() ![]() ![]() 12. Wang T, Yu H, Zhao SB, Zhu B, Chen L, Jing JH, et al. Complete removal of intraspinal extradural mass with unilateral biportal endoscopy. Front Surg 2022;9:1033856.
![]() ![]() ![]() 13. Kang SS, Lee SC, Kim SK. A novel percutaneous biportal endoscopic technique for symptomatic spinal epidural lipomatosis: technical note and case presentations. World Neurosurg 2019;129:49–54.
![]() ![]() 14. Shao R, Cheng W, Zhang W, Liang J, Ruan L, Zhu C, et al. Application of unilateral biportal endoscopy technique to resect a thoracic spinal intradural extramedullary meningioma: technical report and review of the literature. Egypt J Neurol Psychiatry Neurosurg 2024;60:9.
![]() ![]() 15. Choi CM. Biportal endoscopic spine surgery (BESS): considering merits and pitfalls. J Spine Surg 2020;6:457–65.
![]() ![]() ![]() 16. So JY, Park JY. Essential surgical techniques during unilateral biportal endoscopic spine surgery. J Minim Invasive Spine Surg Tech 2023;8:186–97.
![]() ![]() 17. Parihar VS, Yadav N, Yadav YR, Ratre S, Bajaj J, Kher Y. Endoscopic management of spinal intradural extramedullary tumors. J Neurol Surg A Cent Eur Neurosurg 2017;78:219–26.
![]() ![]() 18. Park HJ, Kim SK, Lee SC, Kim W, Han S, Kang SS. Dural tears in percutaneous biportal endoscopic spine surgery: anatomical location and management. World Neurosurg 2020;136:e578–85.
![]() ![]() 19. Wang B, He P, Liu X, Wu Z, Xu B. Complications of unilateral biportal endoscopic spinal surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis of single-arm studies. Orthop Surg 2023;15:3–15.
![]() ![]() ![]() 20. Kim JE, Choi DJ, Park EJ. Risk factors and options of manaagement for an incidental dural tear in biportal endoscopic spine surgery. Asian Spine J 2020;14:790–800.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 21. Lee HG, Kang MS, Kim SY, Cho KC, Na YC, Cho JM, et al. Dural injury in unilateral biportal endoscopic spinal surgery. Global Spine J 2021;11:845–51.
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() 22. Tian Y, Yu KY, Wang YP, Qian J, Qiu GX. Management of cerebrospinal fuid leakage following cervical spine surgery. Chin Med Sci J 2008;23:121–5.
![]() ![]() 23. Kim JE, Choi DJ, Park EJ. Evaluation of postoperative spinal epidural hematoma after biportal endoscopic spine surgery for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis: clinical and magnetic resonance imaging study. World Neurosurg 2019;126:e786–92.
![]() ![]() 24. Biolato M, Vitale F, Galasso T, Gasbarrini A, Grieco A. Minimum platelet count threshold before invasive procedures in cirrhosis: evolution of the guidelines. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023;15:127–41.
![]() ![]() ![]() 25. Veitch AM, Vanbiervliet G, Gershlick AH, Boustiere C, Baglin TP, Smith LA, et al. Endoscopy in patients on antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy, including direct oral anticoagulants: British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) guidelines. Gut 2016;65:374–89.
![]() ![]() ![]() |
|