| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Editorial Office |  
J Minim Invasive Spine Surg Tech > Volume 10(Suppl 1); 2025 > Article
Wang, Chen, Kim, and Chen: A Terminological Suggestion for Spinal Endoscopes

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, the field of spine surgery has witnessed a remarkable transformation with the advent of endoscopic techniques. Endoscopic spine surgery, initially introduced as a minimally invasive approach for lumbar degenerative disc disease, has undergone tremendous advancements in both surgical instruments and techniques. The paradigm shift brought by endoscopic spine surgery has resulted in reducing morbidity, shorter hospital stays, faster return to daily activities, and improved patient outcomes [1-3].

1. The Thriving Development of Spinal Endoscopy

Initially, the application of endoscopic spine surgery was focused on lumbar degenerative disc disease, and intervertebral discs. As surgical instruments and techniques continued to evolve, endoscopic spine surgery had expanded to other regions of the spine, such as the cervical and thoracic spine [4,5]. This expansion opened new possibilities for the treatment of various spinal pathologies, including spinal stenosis, spinal deformities, spinal infection and spinal tumors.

2. The Names of Various Spinal Endoscopes

With the widening range of procedures performed using endoscopic techniques, a plethora of nomenclatures emerged, describing the different surgical approaches. However, the absence of a standardized terminology hindered effective communication and prevented the comparison of outcomes between different studies and surgical centers.
To address this issue, a significant milestone was achieved in 2020 when a consensus was reached on the naming of ‘full endoscopic spinal surgery,’ providing a standardized classification of these procedures [6]. This consensus aimed to bring clarity and uniformity to the field, allowing for more accurate reporting, comparison, and analysis of outcomes. However, certain procedures, despite using endoscope during the surgery, such as Destandau, unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression and fusion, transforaminal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion, endoscopic oblique lateral interbody fusion, microendoscopic discectomy, microendoscopic laminotomy were classified as endoscopy-assisted surgery rather than full endoscopic spine surgery [6]. Recent studies have demonstrated that the prognosis of endoscopy-assisted surgery is comparable to that of full endoscopic spine surgery, highlighting the need for a terminology that encompasses both approaches [7,8].
Considering these developments, there is a need for a comprehensive nomenclature that captures the breadth of endoscopic surgical techniques utilized in the treatment of spinal disorders. The co-corresponding author of the article Dr. Hyeun Sung Kim proposed the term 'spinoscope' to address this requirement, serving as an inclusive descriptor that includes all endoscopic procedures performed on the spine. By adopting the term 'spinoscope,' the medical community can foster a unified language. For instance, if a spine surgeon is interested in entering the field of endoscopic spine surgery, they might search for the term “full endoscopic spine surgery.” In doing so, they could potentially overlook techniques like biportal endoscopic surgery or the Destandau. However, by unifying these techniques under the term 'spinoscope' to represent all spine surgeries using endoscopic techniques, such confusion can be avoided (Figure 1).
The spine comprises intervertebral discs, vertebral bodies, facet joints, and even nerves (Figure 2). Therefore, instead of using more narrowly defined terms like 'vertebroscope,' we utilize the term 'spinoscope' to encompass all endoscopic surgical procedures used for the spine, just as the term 'laparoscope' is used to collectively refer to endoscopic surgeries performed in the abdominal cavity.

CONCLUSION

In summary, the term 'spinoscope' serves as a unifying concept that encompasses all endoscopic surgical procedures used in or assisted by the endoscope for the treatment of spinal disorders. The adoption of this term enables effective communication, collaboration, and standardization within the medical community.

NOTES

Conflict of Interest

HSK and CMC, members of the Editorial Board of JMISST, are the coauthors of this article. However, they played no role whatsoever in the editorial evaluation of this article or the decision to publish it. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding/Support

This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Figure 1.
The term “spinoscope” encompasses all types of spinal surgery using an endoscope. The bubble size represents the volume of published articles in PubMed, with the numbers indicating the total article count.
jmisst-2024-01774f1.jpg
Figure 2.
The spine consists of intervertebral discs, vertebral bodies, facet joints, ligaments, vessels, dura, and nerves. All these structures are potential treatment targets for the spinoscope.
jmisst-2024-01774f2.jpg

REFERENCES

1. Yeung AT, Tsou PM. Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: Surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2002;27:722–31.
crossref pmid
2. Kim M, Lee S, Kim HS, Park S, Shim SY, Lim DJ. A comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar microdiscectomy for lumbar disc herniation in the Korean: a meta-analysis. Biomed Res Int 2018;2018:9073460.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
3. Ahn Y. Endoscopic spine discectomy: indications and outcomes. Int Orthop 2019;43:909–16.
crossref pmid pdf
4. Choi KY, Eun SS, Lee SH, Lee HY. Percutaneous endoscopic thoracic discectomy; transforaminal approach. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2010;53:25–8.
crossref pmid
5. Bae J, Chachan S, Shin SH, Lee SH. Transforaminal endoscopic thoracic discectomy with foraminoplasty for the treatment of thoracic disc herniation. J Spine Surg 2020;6:397–404.
crossref pmid pmc
6. Hofstetter CP, Ahn Y, Choi G, Gibson JNA, Ruetten S, Zhou Y, et al. AOSpine consensus paper on nomenclature for working-channel endoscopic spinal procedures. Global Spine J 2020;10(2 Suppl):111S–121S.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
7. Xie YZ, Shi Y, Zhou Q, Feng CQ, Zhou Y, Li T, et al. Comparison of the safety and efficacy of unilateral biportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion and uniportal endoscopic lumbar interbody fusion: a 1-year follow-up. J Orthop Surg Res 2022;17:360.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
8. Rajamani PA, Goparaju P, Kulkarni AG, Bhojraj SY, Rajasekaran S, Chhabra HS, et al. A 2-year outcomes and complications of various techniques of lumbar discectomy: a multicentric retrospective study. World Neurosurg 2021;156:e319–28.
crossref pmid
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
PubReader  PubReader
ePub Link  ePub Link
XML Download  XML Download
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
  Print
Share:      
METRICS
0
Crossref
1
Scopus
398
View
16
Download
Related article
About |  Browse Articles |  Editorial Policy |  For Contributors
Editorial Office
Department of Neurosurgery, Harrison Spinartus Hospital Chungdam
646 Samseong-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06084, Korea
TEL: +82-2-6003-9767    FAX: +82-2-3445-9755   E-mail: office@jmisst.org
Publisher
Korean Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Society
350 Seocho-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06631, Korea
TEL: +82-2-585-5455    FAX: +82-2-523-6812   E-mail: komisskomiss@gmail.com
Copyright © Korean Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Society.                 Developed in M2PI