| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Editorial Office |  
J Minim Invasive Spine Surg Tech > Volume 11(Suppl 2); 2026 > Article
Trathitephun, Kamolpak, Suwanaratana, and Suvithayasiri: Navigation-Assisted Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic Decompression of Far-Out Compression in Bertolotti Syndrome: A Technical Note

Abstract

Far-out compression in Bertolotti syndrome is a recognized cause of chronic low back pain associated with lumbosacral transitional vertebrae and may present with extraforaminal nerve root compression. We present a technical note demonstrating navigation-assisted unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) decompression in a patient with bilateral far-out stenosis and right-sided pseudoarticulation. Real-time navigation facilitated accurate docking, foraminotomy, nerve root identification, and complete pseudoarticulation resection while preserving the facet joint. Postoperatively, the patient had substantial pain relief and functional recovery. The visual analogue scale score for pain decreased from 9 preoperatively to 5 on postoperative day 1 and to 1 at the 3-month follow-up. This video highlights the technical workflow and advantages of navigation-assisted UBE for complex transitional anatomy with combined foraminal compression and pseudoarticulation.

INTRODUCTION

Far-out syndrome represents a distinct form of extraforaminal stenosis, most commonly involving compression of the L5 nerve root between the L5 transverse process and the sacral ala. This condition is frequently associated with Bertolotti syndrome, a clinical entity characterized by chronic low back pain attributable to a lumbosacral transitional vertebra (LSTV). LSTV is a congenital anomaly defined by enlargement of the L5 transverse process, which may articulate or fuse with the sacrum, resulting in altered biomechanics at the lumbosacral junction [1].
Although often asymptomatic, LSTV has a reported prevalence ranging from 4% to 35% and is particularly relevant in younger patients presenting with chronic low back pain in the absence of significant degenerative changes [2]. The pathophysiology of Bertolotti syndrome is multifactorial, involving pseudoarticulation-related arthritic changes, adjacent segment degeneration, contralateral facet overload, and nerve root impingement [3]. In particular, extraforaminal compression of the L5 nerve root, known as far-out syndrome, presents significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. Due to its atypical presentation, Bertolotti syndrome is frequently misdiagnosed as sacroiliac joint dysfunction or nonspecific mechanical low back pain, often leading to prolonged symptom duration and suboptimal management. Advanced imaging and diagnostic injections play a critical role in identifying the true pain generator. Surgical intervention is reserved for patients who fail conservative management and demonstrate a positive diagnostic block.
In this report, we present a case of bilateral far-out syndrome associated with Bertolotti’s syndrome treated using navigation-assisted unilateral biportal endoscopic (UBE) decompression. We describe a structured surgical workflow to facilitate safe and effective decompression in complex lumbosacral anatomy.

CASE AND OPERATIVE PROCEDURE

1. Case Presentation

A patient presented with a 3-year history of chronic low back pain with daily symptoms, exacerbated by standing and ambulation. The pain radiated bilaterally to the lower extremities and was associated with numbness over the plantar aspects of both feet. Pain severity was reported as 9/10 on the visual analogue scale (VAS). The patient-reported prolonged sitting during work hours. Physical examination revealed tenderness over the bilateral lower lumbar paraspinal regions and hamstring tightness, more pronounced on the right side. Motor strength was preserved (grade 5/5) in all lower extremity muscle groups. Six months prior to presentation, the patient underwent targeted injections, including an L5–S1 facet joint block directed at the pseudoarticulation, as well as bilateral transforaminal epidural steroid injections. These interventions resulted in approximately 70% symptom relief lasting for 4 months. This combined diagnostic and therapeutic response supported the involvement of both the pseudoarticulation and L5 nerve root compression in symptom generation, thereby guiding our surgical strategy. Conservative treatment, including physical therapy and home-based exercises, provided only partial improvement. However, symptoms progressively worsened over the preceding month, limiting ambulation to less than 5 minutes.

2. Preoperative Imaging

Plain radiographs demonstrated a congenital block vertebra at L4–L5. At L5–S1, pseudoarticulation was observed between the right L5 transverse process and the sacral ala, consistent with a Castellvi type II anomaly on the right and type I on the left. Magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography (CT) revealed bilateral far-out compression of the L5 nerve roots associated with pseudoarticulation (Figure 1). Three-dimensional CT reconstruction confirmed a Castellvi type IV LSTV with bilateral extraforaminal pathology (Figure 2).

3. Operative Technique

The patient was positioned prone, and 2 pins were inserted into the left iliac crest to secure the navigation reference frame. A navigation system (Brainlab AG, Germany) was integrated with a mobile 2-dimensional/3-dimensional (2D/3D) C-arm (CIARTIC Move, Siemens Healthineers AG, Germany) to provide real-time intraoperative guidance. The L5–S1 disc level and pedicles were identified and marked on the skin. A navigated probe was first used to guide the skin incision, ensuring an accurate trajectory from the outset. The exact incision position may vary slightly between sides depending on patient anatomy; in general, the right-sided entry point is placed slightly more caudal and/or lateral to avoid a high iliac crest, whereas the left side typically permits a more direct trajectory. In addition, for a right-handed surgeon, the working portal on the right side is positioned slightly closer to the disc level to facilitate ergonomic access to the disc and foraminal region. Two 1-cm incisions were created lateral to the pedicles. Under navigation guidance, a probe was advanced toward the triangulation zone between the isthmus and transverse process of L5. A UBE approach was utilized with a 30° endoscope [4] (Figure 3). Intraoperatively, navigation was utilized continuously rather than for repeated docking: a navigated probe guided the initial trajectory, confirmed key anatomical landmarks before bony work, and verified the adequacy of the bony window after decompression, complementing direct endoscopic visualization. Although a 0° endoscope is more commonly employed in UBE procedures, a 30° endoscope was selected here to provide a wider field of view and deeper visualization in the paraspinal approach; the angled lens can be rotated medially to facilitate access to the intraforaminal region, enhancing surgical reach within the foramen. Its use should be considered selectively, based on the anatomical requirements of the case and the surgeon's experience.
A structured workflow was employed to achieve safe, reproducible outcomes during far-out decompression. The procedure begins with a paraspinal approach and initial docking at the L5 isthmus, followed by identification of key anatomical landmarks, including the transverse process and sacral ala. Foraminotomy is then performed to enlarge the neural foramen and improve access to the extraforaminal zone. Subsequent release of soft tissue structures, particularly the foraminal and iliolumbar ligaments, facilitates adequate exposure. Adhesiolysis and careful mobilization of the nerve root are carried out to relieve tension and improve visualization. When pseudarthrosis is present, it is assessed and resected as necessary; resection (pseudoarthrectomy) is indicated primarily in Jenkins type I and II cases, in which the pseudoarticulation is confirmed as the principal pain generator by a positive diagnostic block. Throughout these steps, navigation is used continuously rather than for repeated docking, confirming the medial and lateral bony margins and the adequacy of the bony window in addition to direct endoscopic visualization, until complete decompression is verified.

4. Right Side (Combined Pathology)

The right side demonstrated foraminal stenosis combined with pseudarthrosis. Initial docking was performed at the L5 isthmus (Figure 3). The transverse process margins were identified, followed by dissection of the pseudarthrosis capsule. Foraminotomy was performed using a 4.0-mm burr to resect the sacral ala. The foraminal ligament was released, and adhesiolysis was carried out to mobilize the exiting L5 nerve root. Navigation confirmed the anatomical location. Pseudarthrosis resection was performed between the inferior L5 transverse process and sacral ala using a diamond burr and Kerrison rongeur. The lateral and medial margins were confirmed with navigation to ensure complete resection. Final visualization demonstrated full decompression and free mobilization of the nerve root.

5. Left Side (Isolated Foraminal Stenosis)

On the left side, only foraminal decompression was required. Docking was performed at the L5 isthmus, followed by identification of key bony landmarks (Figure 3). The foraminal ligament and the iliolumbar ligament were released. Adhesiolysis was performed, and complete decompression of the exiting nerve root was confirmed.

6. Postoperative Outcome

On postoperative day 1, the patient-reported immediate improvement in both back and leg pain, with a VAS score of 5/10, further improving to 1/10 at the 3-month follow-up. Functional outcomes showed parallel improvement, with the Oswestry Disability Index decreasing from 80.0 preoperatively to 48.9 on postoperative day 1 and 31.1 at 3 months. Postoperative radiographs demonstrated complete resection of the right-sided pseudarthrosis with preservation of the L5–S1 facet joint. Postoperative CT and magnetic resonance imaging further confirmed adequate decompression and preservation of the facet joint (Supplementary Video Clip 1). At 3-month follow-up, motor strength was grade 5/5 in all muscle groups, with no sensory deficits or limitations in walking and daily activities.

DISCUSSION

Bertolotti syndrome remains an underrecognized cause of chronic low back pain, particularly in younger patients. The presence of LSTV alters normal spinal biomechanics, leading to abnormal load distribution, adjacent segment degeneration, and potential nerve root compression. Far-out syndrome represents a unique subset of pathology involving extraforaminal nerve compression, which is often missed on routine imaging. The diagnostic challenge contributes to delayed treatment, with patients experiencing prolonged symptoms and reduced quality of life.
Diagnostic injections into the pseudoarticulation are considered the gold standard for confirming the pain source. Surgical intervention is indicated in patients with persistent symptoms despite conservative management and a positive diagnostic block. Minimally invasive techniques, particularly UBE, offer several advantages, including improved visualization, reduced tissue disruption, and preservation of spinal stability. The addition of navigation enhances surgical accuracy, especially in anatomically complex cases such as LSTV, where conventional landmarks may be distorted [4,5]. Although satisfactory clinical outcomes can be achieved using conventional techniques based on anatomical landmarks and fluoroscopic guidance, navigation assistance may offer additional advantages, particularly in complex or altered anatomical conditions. Navigation facilitates more precise anatomical localization, optimizes portal placement, and allows intraoperative confirmation of adequate decompression, thereby reducing the risk of incomplete decompression or iatrogenic injury and lessening reliance on repeated fluoroscopy. These benefits are especially relevant in challenging scenarios, such as congenital anomalies, far-out or extraforaminal pathology, and revision surgery, where standard landmarks may be less reliable. Furthermore, navigation can serve as a valuable adjunct for surgical education and training by improving spatial orientation and operative confidence.
This study has several limitations that should be acknowledged. First, it represents a single case report, which limits the generalizability of the findings. Second, the follow-up period is relatively short, precluding assessment of long-term outcomes and durability of symptom relief. Third, no comparative analysis with other surgical techniques or nonnavigated approaches was performed. Therefore, further studies with larger patient cohorts, longer follow-up, and comparative designs are warranted to validate the efficacy and broader applicability of this technique.
In this case, a tailored approach was employed: combined decompression and pseudarthrosis resection on the symptomatic side, and isolated decompression on the contralateral side.

CONCLUSION

Navigation-assisted UBE decompression is a safe and effective technique for the management of far-out syndrome associated with Bertolotti syndrome. The use of a structured surgical workflow facilitates precise decompression of the exiting nerve root, even in complex lumbosacral anatomy, while preserving spinal stability. This approach provides favorable clinical outcomes and represents a valuable minimally invasive option for patients with refractory symptoms.

WRITTEN TRANSCRIPT

00:00 Introduction

In this study, we review far-out syndrome, including its clinical relevance and underlying anatomy. We discuss the biomechanical mechanisms of L5 nerve root compression, the diagnostic challenges associated with extraforaminal pathology, and current management strategies. Finally, we present a concise surgical workflow for far-out decompression.

00:22 Bertolotti Syndrome and Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebra

Bertolotti syndrome refers to chronic low back pain attributed to LSTV. LSTV is a common congenital anomaly characterized by enlargement of the L5 transverse process, which may form a pseudoarticulation or complete osseous fusion with the sacrum, resulting in an abnormal biomechanical connection. Despite being asymptomatic in many cases, LSTVs have a reported prevalence of 4%–35%, with an average of 12.3% on plain radiographs. The condition is commonly observed in patients younger than 30 years presenting with chronic low back pain, in whom degenerative changes are typically minimal.

00:52 Biomechanical Pathophysiology of Pain Generation

The pain in Bertolotti syndrome is multifactorial and arises from several distinct mechanisms: arthritic changes – degeneration of the Castellvi type II pseudoarticulation can provoke inflammation and nociceptive pain. Adjacent segment degeneration – increased rigidity at L5–S1 shifts biomechanical stress to the L4–L5 segment, promoting hypermobility, disc degeneration, herniation, and facet arthrosis. Contralateral facet arthrosis – unilateral LSTV alters load distribution, resulting in progressive contralateral facet arthrosis at L5–S1. Nerve root impingement – depending on the dominant pathology, neural compression may involve the L5 nerve root directly or extraforaminally, or the L4 nerve root due to adjacent segment degeneration at L4–5.

01:46 The Diagnostic Dilemma

Bertolotti’s syndrome is frequently overlooked and misdiagnosed as “sacroiliac joint dysfunction” or general “mechanical low back pain.” On average, patients suffer from symptoms for 41.4 months before reaching a correct diagnosis. This delay results in a significant patient burden, including failed treatments and chronic psychological distress. Research indicates that Bertolotti syndrome patients often report worse mental and physical health scores (Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System) compared to those with standard lumbosacral radiculopathy.

02:12 Management

The management path follows a structured progression based on symptoms. Conservative care: initial treatment for all patients involves nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and specialized physical therapy focusing on core and gluteal strengthening to stabilize the hypermobile levels. Diagnostic injections: the gold standard and most critical diagnostic step. A fluoroscopic-guided injection of local anesthetic into the pseudoarticulation must provide greater than 50%–75% temporary relief to confirm the joint as the pain source.

02:38 Surgical Intervention

Surgical intervention is reserved for those who fail more than 6 months of conservative care and have a mandatory positive diagnostic block. Resection (pseudoarthrectomy): resection is particularly suitable for Jenkins type I and II cases, in which the pseudoarticulation itself is the primary pain generator. Minimally invasive techniques, including microscopic and endoscopic approaches, can be considered viable options, offering favorable clinical outcomes. Fusion: often a more definitive biomechanical solution for Castellvi type 3 and 4 cases or those with underlying instability.

03:11 Case Presentation

The patient presented with a 3-year history of chronic low back pain with daily symptoms, aggravated by standing and ambulation. The pain radiated bilaterally to the lower extremities and was accompanied by numbness over both plantar aspects of the feet. Pain intensity was rated as 9/10. The patient-reported prolonged sitting during work hours. On physical examination, there was tenderness over the bilateral lower lumbar paraspinal regions and hamstring tightness, more pronounced on the right side. Motor strength was normal (5/5) in all lower extremity muscle groups. Six months prior to presentation, the patient underwent diagnostic facet joint block at L5–S1 and bilateral L5–S1 transforaminal epidural steroid injections, resulting in approximately 70% improvement in both axial back pain and radicular symptoms for 4 months. Previous conservative management, including physical therapy with lumbar traction and home-based stretching exercises, provided partial symptom relief. Over the past month, the patient’s symptoms progressively worsened, limiting ambulation to less than 5 minutes. The pain intensity increased again to 9/10.

03:43 Preoperative Imaging

Plain lumbosacral radiographs (anteroposterior and lateral views) demonstrate a congenital block vertebra at the L4–L5 level. At L5–S1, there is pseudoarticulation between the right L5 transverse process and the sacral ala, consistent with a Castellvi type II anomaly on the right side and Castellvi type I on the left. Magnetic resonance imaging of the lumbosacral spine demonstrates pseudoarticulation (orange arrow). The blue arrow indicates right-sided far-out compression, while the red arrow shows left-sided far-out compression. CT scan of the lumbosacral spine demonstrates pseudoarticulation (orange arrow). The blue arrow indicates right-sided far-out compression, while the red arrow shows left-sided far-out compression. Three-dimensional CT reconstruction demonstrates overall far-out pathology consistent with a Castellvi type IV LSTV.

04:33 Surgical Technique

Two pins of the navigation reference frame were inserted into the left iliac crest to establish rigid fixation for the navigation system. A navigation platform (Brainlab AG) was utilized and integrated with the CIARTIC Move (Siemens Healthineers AG), a self-driving 2D/3D mobile C-arm system, to enable intraoperative image acquisition and real-time navigated guidance. The surgical incisions were planned by first marking the L5–S1 disc level and identifying the pedicles of L5 and S1 on the skin surface. A 1-cm skin incision was then created lateral to each pedicle. Under navigation guidance, a probe was introduced through the incision and directed toward the triangulation zone at the isthmus and transverse process of L5 to achieve accurate targeting.

05:14 Surgical Workflow

The workflow for far-out decompression surgery begins with a paraspinal approach to achieve adequate exposure and decompression of the exiting nerve root. Initial docking is performed at the isthmus, followed by foraminoplasty to widen the neural foramen. The compressive pathology, including the iliolumbar ligament, is carefully identified and addressed. Resection of the pseudarthrosis is then performed. Subsequently, docking is repositioned at the lower edge of the L5 transverse process and the iliac crest to optimize access. The medial and lateral borders of pseudarthrosis are clearly identified to ensure complete and adequate decompression.

05:58 Right-Sided Pathology

The primary right-sided pathology consisted of foraminal compression associated with pseudarthrosis; therefore, we aimed to demonstrate UBE treatment addressing both foraminal decompression and pseudarthrosis resection. The endoscopic view, obtained using a 30° angled scope, demonstrates initial docking at the L5 isthmus, confirmed with a navigated probe. The superior and inferior margins of the L5 transverse process were subsequently identified. Careful dissection of the pseudarthrosis capsule was then performed to fully expose the pseudoarticulation. Foraminoplasty was initiated using a 4.0-mm oval cutting burr (CONMED Oval Bur, REF: H9101) to resect the sacral ala. Bony removal was continued until the endoscope could be advanced deeply toward the superior articular process. An angled curette was used to dissect and release the foraminal ligament. All fibrous adhesions were lysed to achieve free mobilization of the nerve root. Navigation was used to confirm the position at the shoulder of the right L5 exiting nerve root. Initial resection of the pseudarthrosis was performed. The pseudoarticulation was resected between the inferior edge of the L5 transverse process and the sacral ala. A 3-mm diamond burr was then used for controlled bony refinement, followed by Kerrison rongeur to complete the resection and decompression. Anterior capsule was resected after identifying the lateral margin of the pseudarthrosis. The lateral margin of the pseudarthrosis resection was first confirmed using a navigated probe followed by medial boundary verification, then complete resection of the pseudarthrosis. The final endoscopic view demonstrated full decompression of the exiting nerve root with complete resection of the pseudarthrosis and adequate neural mobilization.

08:00 Left-Sided Pathology

On the left side, the primary pathology involved isolated foraminal stenosis; therefore, only foraminal decompression was performed. The procedure began with docking at the L5 isthmus, and the position was confirmed using image-guided navigation. The inferior margin of the L5 transverse process was then identified, followed by localization of the superior border of the sacral ala to establish the bony landmarks for foraminoplasty. The foraminal ligament was dissected to expose the exiting nerve root. Adhesiolysis was performed to mobilize the nerve root, including release of the iliolumbar ligament. An angled probe was then used to dissect the remaining fibrotic tissue. Finally, the shoulder and axillary zones of the nerve root were identified and confirmed using a navigated probe.

08:57 Postoperative Radiographs

Postoperative radiographs demonstrate complete resection of the right-sided pseudarthrosis, while the L5–S1 facet joint remains intact.

09:06 Postoperative Progress Notes

On postoperative day 1, the patient-reported immediate improvement in both back and leg pain, with a VAS score of 5/10. At 3-month follow-up, motor strength was grade 5 in all muscle groups, with no sensory deficits. The patient had no limitation in walking or daily activities.

09:20 Conclusion

Navigation-assisted UBE enables precise and safe decompression in far-out syndrome, particularly in complex lumbosacral anatomy, while preserving spinal stability.

Supplementary Material

Supplementary Video Clip 1 is available at https://doi.org/10.21182/jmisst.2026.03496.

Supplementary Video Clip 1.

Navigation-assisted unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression of far-out compression in Bertolotti syndrome. The video demonstrates the clinical background, preoperative imaging, surgical technique, including bilateral decompression and pseudoarticulation resection, and postoperative outcomes.

NOTES

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Funding/Support

This study received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from the patient included in this study, as approved by the institutional review board (IRB) of Chulabhorn Royal Academy (IRB No. 064/2569).

Acknowledgments

The voiceover narration for the supplementary video was generated using the text-to-speech feature available in CapCut (ByteDance Ltd.).

Figure 1.
Plain anteroposterior (A) and lateral (D) radiographs of the lumbosacral spine demonstrate a congenital block vertebra at L4–5 and pseudoarticulation at L5–S1. T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates far-out zone compression. The orange and white arrows indicate right-sided extraforaminal compression, the blue arrow indicates left-sided involvement, and the red arrow indicates the iliolumbar ligament. (F and G) also demonstrate bilateral foraminal stenosis at L5–S1, supporting the decision to perform bilateral foraminotomy. In the axial images, the overlay labels identify the imaging level: “L5” indicates the L5 vertebral level, and “L5–S1” indicates the L5–S1 disc level. (B) Axial T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the L5 level demonstrating right-sided extraforaminal (far-out) compression (orange arrow); the red arrow denotes the iliolumbar ligament. (C) Axial T2-weighted MRI at the L5–S1 level demonstrating right-sided extraforaminal compression (orange arrow). (E) Midsagittal T2-weighted MRI of the lumbosacral spine.
jmisst-2026-03496f1.jpg
Figure 2.
Three-dimensional computed tomography reconstruction confirms a Castellvi type IV lumbosacral transitional vertebra with bilateral extraforaminal pathology. The orange arrow indicates the pseudoarticulation, the blue arrow indicates right-sided far-out compression, and the red arrow indicates left-sided far-out compression. (A and B) Reformatted CT images demonstrating the right-sided pseudoarticulation between the L5 transverse process and the sacral ala (orange arrow) in coronal (A) and sagittal (B) planes. (C, D) Reformatted CT images demonstrating left-sided far-out compression (red arrow) in coronal (C) and sagittal (D) planes. (E) Axial CT demonstrating right-sided far-out compression (blue arrow) and left-sided far-out compression (red arrow). (F–H) Three-dimensional CT reconstructions in left lateral (F), posterior (G), and right lateral (H) projections.
jmisst-2026-03496f2.jpg
Figure 3.
(A) Right-sided approach with an approximately 1-cm skin incision and portal creation lateral to the L5 and S1 pedicles; the red portal indicates the viewing portal, and the blue portal indicates the working portal. (B) Left-sided approach. (C) A navigation probe assists trajectory planning from the skin incision, targeting triangulation at the L5 isthmus and transverse process. (D) Navigation reference frame inserted at the left iliac crest.
jmisst-2026-03496f3.jpg

REFERENCES

1. McGrath K, Schmidt E, Rabah N, Abubakr M, Steinmetz M. Clinical assessment and management of Bertolotti Syndrome: a review of the literature. Spine J 2021;21:1286–96.
crossref pmid
2. Knopf J, Lee S, Bulsara K, Moss I, Choi D, Onyiuke H. Onyiuke Grading Scale: a clinical classification system for the diagnosis and management of Bertolotti syndrome. Neurochirurgie 2021;67:540–6.
crossref pmid
3. Rakauskas TR, Gallup S, Mohamed AA, Nasice J, Westerhaus B. An update on the prevalence and management of Bertolotti's syndrome. Front Surg 2024;11:1486811.
crossref pmid pmc
4. Kavishwar RA, Liang Y, Lee D, Kim J, Pedraza M, Kim JS. O-Arm navigation-guided unilateral biportal endoscopic decompression of Far-Out Syndrome. Neurospine 2024;21:1149–53.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
5. Heo DH, Sharma S, Park CK. Endoscopic treatment of extraforaminal entrapment of L5 nerve root (Far Out Syndrome) by unilateral biportal endoscopic approach: technical report and preliminary clinical results. Neurospine 2019;16:130–7.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
About |  Browse Articles |  Editorial Policy |  For Contributors
Editorial Office
Department of Neurosurgery, Harrison Spinartus Hospital Chungdam
646 Samseong-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06084, Korea
TEL: +82-2-6003-9767    FAX: +82-2-3445-9755   E-mail: office@jmisst.org
Publisher
Korean Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Society
350 Seocho-daero, Seocho-gu, Seoul 06631, Korea
TEL: +82-2-585-5455    FAX: +82-2-523-6812   E-mail: komisskomiss@komiss.org
Copyright © Korean Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery Society.                 Developed in M2PI